Walls v. The Conflict Defenders Office et al
| Douglas Walls |
| The Conflict Defenders Office and Alex Veylupek |
| 2:2010cv02609 |
| September 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/2/2011 RECOMMENDING that pltf's 13 motion be denied and this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections due w/in 14 days.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/13/2010 ORDERING that w/in 14 days, ptnr to SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to Heck.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/8/10: Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
