Cases 1 - 10 of 12
WALL v. ETHICON, INC.
as 2:2014cv00678
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS WALL
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walling et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv31409
Plaintiff:
Cheryl A. Walling and Douglas Walling
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wall et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv29000
Plaintiff:
Tina M. Wall and Douglas Wall
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walls v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00637
Plaintiff:
Douglas Walls
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC and Biomet U.S. Reconstruction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walls v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv02630
Plaintiff:
Douglas Walls
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc., Biomet Orthopedics, LLC, Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wall et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv00656
Plaintiff:
Douglas Wall and Candace Wall
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wall et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv04379
Defendant:
Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Candace Wall and Douglas Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Walls v. The Conflict Defenders Office et al
as 2:2010cv02609
Plaintiff:
Douglas Walls
Defendant:
The Conflict Defenders Office and Alex Veylupek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walls v. McGinness et al
as 2:2007cv02479
Plaintiff:
Douglas Walls
Defendant:
John McGinness and Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Sacramento Main Jail
as 2:2007cv01740
Petitioner:
Douglas Walls
Respondent:
Sacramento Main Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
