Sherman v. Reisig et al
Plaintiff: |
Joe Sherman |
Defendant: |
Jeff Reisig, Dave Henderson, Alvina Tzang and Terry Bassett |
Case Number: |
2:2010cv02939 |
Filed: |
November 2, 2010 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Office: |
Sacramento Office |
County: |
Sacramento |
Presiding Judge: |
Kendall J. Newman |
Presiding Judge: |
Frank C. Damrell |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
August 22, 2012 |
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/21/12 ORDERING that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed June 21, 2012, are ADOPTED; Plaintiff' action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rules 110 and 183(a); and the Clerk of Court shall close this case and vacate all dates. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)
|
June 21, 2012 |
Filing
12
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/20/2012 RECOMMENDING that Plaintiff's action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rules 110 and 183 (a). The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case and vacate all dates. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)
|
May 31, 2012 |
Filing
11
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/30/12: Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, no later than June 14, 2012, why this case should not be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to prosecute the action and failure to follow the court's orders. On or before June 14, 2012, plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint that addresses the issues raised in the court's screening order entered on April 9, 2012. (Kaminski, H)
|
April 9, 2012 |
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/6/12 ORDERING that Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of this order to file a second amended complaint that is complete in itself. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
June 10, 2011 |
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/9/2011 ORDERING that plaintiff's 7 motion for relief from judgment is DENIED. (Duong, D)
|
January 11, 2011 |
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/10/11: Plaintiff's objections filed December 23, 2010, are overruled 4 . Plaintiff may, within 30 days from the date of this order, file an amended complaint in accordance with the court's December 14, 2010 order. (Kaminski, H)
|
December 14, 2010 |
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/13/2010 ORDERING that Pltf's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. Pltf's 1 Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Pltf is GRANTED 30 days to file an amended complaint. (Zignago, K.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?