Kool v. Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Troy Kool
Defendant: Target Corporation
Case Number: 2:2010cv02950
Filed: November 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Lawrence K. Karlton
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 24 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/13/11 ORDERING that the 4/25/11, hearing on defendant Target Corporation's Motion to Dismiss, Stay, or Transfer this action on account of Previously-filed Class Action; or Alt ernatively, to transfer venue; or Alternatively, to Stay Action Pending Outcome of Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court 9 is VACATED; the 4/25/11, initial status conference also is VACATED; The action is stayed for all purposes pending final resolution of the parties' settlement; The parties are directed to report on the progress of the settlement approval process as it proceeds before the court in Mesindo Pompa, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. Target Corporation, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants, U.S.D.C., C.D. Cal., No. CV 10-0634 AHM (FFMx), with the understanding that dismissal of this action will be part of settlement once approved. (Becknal, R)
April 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/1/11 ORDERING pltf to SHOW CAUSE in writing why sanctions should not issue in accordancewith Local Rule 110, including a fine of $150 and/ordismissal of this case, for their failure to fil e anopposition or statement of non-opposition to themotions. See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), Link v. WabashR.R., 370 U.S. 626, 633 (1962). Counsel shall file aresponse to this order to show cause no later than 4/11/11; hearing on defendants motion to dismiss, stay, ortransfer 9 is CONTINUED to 4/25/11 at10:00 a.m.; Plaintiff shall file and serve his opposition orstatement of non-opposition on or before 4/11/11.Defendant may file and serve a reply no later than 4/18/11. (Carlos, K)
January 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER 19 , signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/10/11: The hearing on dft Target Corp's 9 Motion to Dismiss, Stay or Transfer is CONT'D to 4/11/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. The Status Conference is CONT'D to 4/25/2011 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton (Kastilahn, A)
December 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/8/10 ORDERING the Hearing for the motions 9 to dismiss are reset to 1/18/11 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Becknal, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kool v. Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Greggory W. Dalton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Troy Kool
Represented By: Richard David Lambert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?