Fox et al v. Anderson et al
| Barry Fox, Narcisa Fox, Anthony Fox, Daniel Fox, Samuel Fox and Mario Fox |
| Jason Walkup, Joy Pike, County of Sacramento, City of Rancho Cordova, Jasmine Delgado, R Cockerton, Elisa Olmo, Soka Om, Scott Anderson and B. McAtee |
| 2:2011cv00419 |
| February 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John A. Mendez |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/19/2013 RECOMMENDING that the 86 Amended Motion for Default Judgment be granted in part; RECOMMENDING that judgment be entered for the plaintiffs on their eighth claim for relief re 14 First Amended Complaint against Defendant Jasmine Delgado; RECOMMENDING that judgment be entered for the plaintiffs in the amount of $200,000.00; REFERRING this matter to Judge John A. Mendez; ORDERING that objections be filed within fourteen (14) days. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/12/2013 ORDERING that the 84 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED IN FULL. Plaintiffs' 68 motion for default judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/12/2013 ORDERING 68 that the 2/20/2013 hearing on plainitffs' motion for default judgment is VACATED; RECOMMENDING 68 that plaintiff's motion for default judgment be denied without prejudice; Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/3/2013 GRANTING 76 Motion to Appoint Guardians ad Litem. Plaintiffs Barry Fox and Narcisa Fox are APPOINTED Guardians ad litem for Minor Plaintiffs. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
65
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/13/2012 ACCORDINGLY 45 Defendants' motion for summary adjudication on all the claims against McAtee is GRANTED. Defendants' Motion for Summary Adjudication on the claims brought by Plaintiffs in their First Amended Complaint against Defendants County of Sacramento, City of Rancho Cordova, and Brendan McAtee is GRANTED. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/10/12 ORDERING that Defendants' 45 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART. The court allowed Plaintiffs to submit supplemental evidence regarding Plaintiffs' expert qualifications and to provide evidence previously omitted inadvertently, to which Defendants may reply. Following these filings, the Court will determine whether such evidence should be considered, and issue a ruling as to these Defendants.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
44
STIPULATION and ORDER 43 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/9/12 ORDERING that defendants have up to and including 7/20/12, to comply with the Discovery Order dated 6/8/12.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER denying defendants' 38 Motion for Reconsideration, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/9/12. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/7/2012 GRANTING in part 32 Motion to Compel Production of Documents; ORDERING that the County's production and declaration be delivered to Plaintiffs by 6/15/2012. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/12/2012 MODIFYING the 13 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order. Disclosure of Expert Witnesses due by 4/23/2012, Disclosure of Supplemental and Rebuttal Witnesses due by 5/15/2012. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/23/11. The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the First and Second Claims as to Olmo, Om, Pike, and Walkup 16 WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to dismiss Pike from the Third Claim WITH PREJUDICE. The Court DENIES Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pike from the Fourth Claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), but, as indicated below, finds that Pike has quasi-judicial and qualified immunity as to this claim. Defendant s' Motion to Dismiss the Third and Fourth Claims as against Anderson, McAtee, and Cockerton is GRANTED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Defendants Olmo, Om, Pike, and Walkup are entitled to absolute immunity as to the Third Claim. Defendants Olmo, Om, Pike, and Walkup are entitled to quasi- judicial qualified immunity as to the Fourth Claim for relief. Plaintiffs shall have twenty (20) days from the date of this Order to file a Second Amended Complaint if they so desire. Otherwise, this case will proceed against the remaining Defendants on the First Amended Complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
7
STIPULATION and ORDER 6 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/18/11, ORDERING that Defendants County of Sacramento, Scott Anderson, Rich Cockerton, Brendan McAtee, Elisa Olmo, Soka Om, Jason Walkup, Joy Pike and City of Rancho Cordova have up to and including 4/7/11 to file a responsive pleading. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
