Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Fox v. Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City, Missouri et al
as 4:2022cv00526
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fox
Defendant:
Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City, Missouri, James Gottstein, William Majors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kimball v. Fox et al
as 1:2022cv01960
Plaintiff:
Micha Kimball
Defendant:
Denver City and County, Daniel Fox, Jami Sisneros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCurdy v. US Ecology, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01685
Plaintiff:
Teresa McCurdy
Defendant:
US Ecology, Inc., Richard Burke, E. Renae Conley and others
Whitfield v. US Ecology, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01515
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
US Ecology, Inc., Richard Burke, E. Renae Conley and others
BAKER v. US ECOLOGY, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
LEWIS D BAKER
Defendant:
US ECOLOGY, INC., RICHARD BURKE, E. RENAE CONLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
O'Dell v. US Ecology, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02131
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
US Ecology, Inc., E. Renae Conley, Katina Dorton and others
Pizzaro v. US Ecology, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02144
Plaintiff:
Ray Pizzaro
Defendant:
US Ecology, Inc., Richard Burke, E. Renae Conley and others
LANE v. EASTTOWN TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2020cv05761
Defendant:
UNRUH TURNER BURKE & FREES ATTORNEYS AT LAW, DANIEL FOX, ANDREW RAU and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. LANE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fox v. SSA
as 6:2020cv00201
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Plaintiff:
Joseph Daniel Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FOX v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2020cv07781
Defendant:
PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA LP, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FOX
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
