Bowyer v. Target Corporation
| Jackie Bowyer |
| Target Corporation, Target Stores, Target Stores, Inc. and Target |
| 2:2011cv00804 |
| March 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/15/11 ORDERING that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/1/2011 re 23 ORDERING that the time within which this action is to be dismissed be extended from November 23, 2011 to December 6, 2011. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/27/11 EXTENDING the time within which this action is to be dismissed to 11/23/11. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER RE DISPOSAL DOCUMENTS signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/6/2011 ORDERING that dispositional documents shall be filed within 20 days. All hearing dates are VACATED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/20/11. This action is Referred to the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
