Portnoy v. City of Woodland et al
Plaintiff: Sergei Portnoy
Defendant: Chan, City of Woodland, Drobish and Towle
Case Number: 2:2011cv01720
Filed: June 27, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Yolo
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER denying 64 Motion for production of transcript at government expense signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/4/13. (Kaminski, H)
May 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 52 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/16/13 RECOMMENDING that 43 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by City of Woodland, Towle, Drobish, Chan be granted; and the Clerk be directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants and close this case. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Meuleman, A)
August 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/30/12 ORDERING that the 34 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice; the 20 , 30 Schuedling Order is MODIFIED as follows: the law and motion completion deadline is continued to 12/05/12 for the limited purpose of permitting defendants to file a revised motion for summary judgment. That motion shall be filed by 10/15/12, plaintiff's opposition due by 11/05/12, defendants' reply due 11/19/12 and the motion will be heard on 12/05/12 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 24; Final Pretrial Conference set for 03/04/13 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Jury Trial set for 06/04/13 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. All other dates and deadlines set forth in the Scheduling Order remain the same. (Benson, A.)
June 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/28/12 ORDERING that The hearing on defendants' motion for summary judgment, 34 , is continued to 8/29/12; On or before 8/8/12, plaintiff shall file a revised opposition to the motion, in c ompliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and Local Rule 260; Failure of plaintiff to comply with this order may be deemed a statement of non-opposition to the motion, and may result in a recommendation that the motion be granted and/or that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with court orders and this court's Local Rules; Defendants may file a reply to plaintiff's revised opposition on or before 8/15/12. (Becknal, R)
April 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 33 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/5/2012 ORDERING that Discovery shall be completed 6/15/2012; ORDERING that motions to compel discovery must be heard no later than 5/16/2012; ORDERING that all law and motion, except as to discovery, shall be completed by 7/25/2012. (Michel, G)
March 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/12/2012 GRANTING in part, DENYING in part 22 , 25 Motions to Quash; DENYING, without prejudice, Defendant's 26 Request for a court order; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to redact all dates of birth, social security numbers and financial Account numbers from 22 , 25 Motions to Quash. (Michel, G)
February 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/13/2012 ORDERING the 22 & 25 MOTIONS to QUASH hearings are CONTINUED to 2/29/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. The parties are DIRECTED to mee t and confer either telephonically or in person in an effor to resolve the discovery disputes without court intervention. If the parties are unable to resolve their disputes, plainitff shall file a joint statement re: Discovery Disagreement on or before 2/20/12. (Donati, J)
July 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/6/11 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to issue forthwith all process pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. Plaintiff shall supply the U.S. Marshal, wi thin 14 days from the date this order is filed, all information needed by the Marshal to effect service of process, and shall, within 14 days thereafter, file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the U.S. Marshal. The U.S. Marshal shall serve process, with copies of this court's scheduling order and related documents, within 90 days of receipt of the required information from plaintiffs; and shall, within 14 days thereafter, file a statement with the court that said documents have been served. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (cc:USM). (Meuleman, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Portnoy v. City of Woodland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Woodland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Drobish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Towle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sergei Portnoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?