Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Chan v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv06056
Plaintiff:
Philip Chan
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03345
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harjani, et al v. GGP-Natick West L.L.C., et al
as 26-2053
Plaintiff:
HITESH HARJANI, NICHOLAS J. FIORILLO and GATSBY'S CHOP HOUSE, LLC
Defendant:
GGP-NATICK WEST L.L.C., BROOKFIELD PROPERTIES, NICHOLAS MARONA and others
Chan v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv06057
Plaintiff:
Samoeun Chan
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Cooper v. Wills et al
as 3:2026cv01282
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cooper
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Dr. David, Quinnton Bent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Smith et al
as 1:2026cv00458
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jordan
Defendant:
FNU Smith, FNU Strong, FNU Goodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wu et al v. Louinord et al
as 4:2026cv07629
Plaintiff:
Monica Tzuying Wu and Ting-Chak Chan
Defendant:
Luthiel Jr. Louinord, Stephjay Enterprise Inc. f/k/a Bolls Trucking Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 - Americans With Disabilities Act - Employment
Chan v. Bacdayan, et al.
as 26-5719
Plaintiff:
YU HIN CHAN
Defendant:
KAREN MAY BACDAYAN, KEVIN C. MCCLANAHAN, CARMEN A. PACHECO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
