Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3358
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Beijing Dayou Dingxin Investment Management Partnership, L.P. et al. v. Wang et al.
as 1:2024cv00137
Petitioner: Beijing Dayou Dingxin Investment Management Partnership, L.P. and Suzhou Youtou Cornerstone Enterprise Management Center, L.P.
Respondent: Chan Qian Wang and Hao Zhou
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
David Oiler v. David LeMaster
as 24-5033
Petitioner: DAVID CHANNING OILER
Respondent: DAVID LEMASTER, Warden
Cooper v. Willis et al
as 2:2023cv03753
Plaintiff: Kitt Channing Cooper, Jr.
Defendant: Wayne Willis, Jeannie E Willis and Jason Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01094
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Oiler v. LeMaster We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv00090
Petitioner: David Channing Oiler
Respondent: Warden LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McGraw v. Jordan
as 0:2023cv00015
Petitioner: Austin Channing McGraw
Respondent: Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hines v. Tennessee Dept of Corrections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01286
Plaintiff: Channing Hines
Defendant: Tennessee Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00757
Plaintiff: CHANNING MARSHALL and LEMELL POWELL
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Augustine Chan-Poroj v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3885
Petitioner: AUGUSTINE CHAN-POROJ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?