Real v. Soltanian-Zedeh et al
| Douglas Real |
| Jalal Soltanian-Zedeh, Stephen Tseng, Christopher Smith, Scott Heatley, Karen Todd, A Kettelhake, L. Heffner and M. Galloway |
| 2:2011cv01821 |
| July 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Amador |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/27/15 denying 71 Motion to strike. Also, RECOMMENDING that Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment 74 be denied. Defendants' motion for summary judgment 73 be granted and judgment entered for defendants Soltanian-Zadeh and Tseng. Motions 73 and 74 referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/20/14 ORDERING that plaintiffs motion to compel discovery responses from defendants 61 is granted, discovery is re-opened for the limited purpose of allowing plaintiff responses to his previo usly-propounded discovery requests; Defendants must provide their responses to plaintiffs previously served discovery requests within 45 days of the date of this order; To the extent that plaintiff seeks to extend the discovery cut-off date by his motion for partial summary judgment and to extend the discovery cut-off date 63 , that motion is denied as moot; Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment 63 is vacated from the courts calendar without prejudice to its modification and renewal once defendants discovery responses have been served upon him; Defendants motion for summary judgment 64 is vacated from the courts calendar.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/24/13 GRANTING 58 Motion to conduct Plaintiff Douglas Reals (D-16502) deposition viavideoconference. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which Plaintiff is housed to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/29/2013 ADOPTING 51 Findings and Recommendations in full and GRANTING-IN-PART and DENYING-IN-PART 29 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants Soltanian-Zadeh adn Tseng are DIRECTED to file an answer within 30 days of service of this order. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/5/13 ORDERING that defendants motion to strike in part plaintiffs sur-reply (ECF No. 45 ) is granted as set forth above. It is RECOMMENDED that Defendants motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies be granted as to defendants Smith, Heatley, Galloway and Todd only and these defendants be dismissed; Defendants motion to dismiss plaintiffs state law negligence claim be granted and thi s claim be dismissed; Defendants motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim be granted as to defendant Kettelhake and denied as to defendants Soltanian-Zadeh and Tseng; and Defendants Soltanian-Zadeh and Tseng be directed to file an answer within thirty days following adoption of these findings and recommendations, should that occur. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER adopting 48 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/5/12: Defendant Heffner is dismissed from this action without prejudice. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 09/20/12 ORDERING the clerk of the court make a District Judge assignment to this case. U.S. District Judge Lawrence K. Karlton randomly assigned to this case. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendant Heffner be dismissed from this action without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 4(m). Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/3/2012, giving notice to plaintiff, that within 14 days, if plaintiff does not SHOW GOOD CAUSE for the failure for service to be effected upon defendant Heffner, he will be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 4(m).(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/12/12 ORDERING that plaintiff will be provided 21 days to file additional evidentiary submissions if he wishes. There will be no extensions of time. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 04/19/12 ordering that in order to ascertain whether defendant Heffner's location can be unearthed, defendants' counsel shall query the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to a scertain the whereabouts of Dr. L. Heffner. If defendant Heffner is still employed with the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation or any other California State Agency, counsel shall provide the business address to plaintiff. If counsel is ot herwise informed of the business address of defendant Heffner, counsel shall provide the address to plaintiff. In the event that counsel, after conducting a good faith inquiry, cannot ascertain the business address of defendant Heffner, counsel shall so inform the court. Defendants' counsel shall file and serve the appropriate response within 14 days of the file date of this order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 02/06/12 ordering the Clerk of the Court shall send to plaintiff 2 USM-285 forms, instruction sheet and a copy of the 10/14/11 complaint to be completed and returned within 60 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/11/2012 ORDERING that plaintiff's 10 motion for TRO/preliminary injunctive relief, construed as a motion for a protective order, is DENIED. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/13/2011 ORDERING the AG and pertinent defendants, as set forth in this order, to file a response to plaintiff's 10 motion for TRO/preliminary injunctive relief, construed as a motion fo r protective order, within 14 days;the clerk to serve a copy of plaintiff's 10 motion, a copy of the 11 Service Documents Order, and a copy of the instant order upon Monica Anderson electronically and to serve the same three documents on the litigation coordinator and defendant Kettelhake at Mule Creek State Prison. (cc: Monica Anderson) (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 09/21/11 ordering plaintiff has paid the filing fee in full and will be assessed no further filing fee; however plaintiff will be granted an opportunity to submit within 28 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the clerk of the court. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff a new application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. The complaint is dismissed for the reasons discussed above with leave to file an amended complaint within 28 days from the date of service of this order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/18/11 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
