Cases 1 - 10 of 100
M.B. et al v. DeKalb County School District et al
as 1:2026cv06506
Plaintiff:
M.B., T.W. and K.M.
Defendant:
DeKalb County School District, DeKalb County Board of Education, Adam Christopher Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2026cv01558
Petitioner:
Christopher Phillip Smith and Christopher Smith
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anndell Lawrence, Jr. v. Laresha Reed, et al
as 26-3135
Plaintiff:
Anndell R. Lawrence, Jr.
Defendant:
Laresha Reed, Individual Capacity, Crystal Woods, Skylar Blake, Individual Capacity and others
Smith v. Federal Express Corporation
as 7:2026cv04669
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Justin Smith
as 26-5883
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Smith v. GE Aerospace Pension Plan
as 6:2026cv04300
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Defendant:
GE Aerospace Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
(PC) Hoyt v. El Dorado County Sheriff Jail Division et al
as 2:2026cv03368
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Hoyt
Defendant:
El Dorado County Sheriff Jail Division, Wellpath and Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios Jr. v. DeWittt County Jail et al
as 4:2026cv08622
Plaintiff:
Raul Rios Jr.
Defendant:
DeWittt County Jail, Officer Darwin, Sgt. Hosek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv01595
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Justin SmithIn re: Justin Smith
as 26-5834
Petitioner:
In re: JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
