Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Bowersox v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. et al.
as 1:2023cv02287
Plaintiff:
Lacee Bowersox
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., Kelly Weaver, Madison Conrad Hogie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Copeland v. Richland County/Richland County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2023cv01517
Plaintiff:
Jon Copeland
Defendant:
Richland County/Richland County Board of Commissioners, J. Steve Sheldon, Chuka D. Onyeneke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2021cv00623
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith and Kandice Cowan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv00530
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Sturgill v. Muterspaw et al
as 1:2019cv00594
Defendant:
John Does, Officer Mann, Officer Downing and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jaaron M Sturgill, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Merlak
as 4:2017cv00538
Petitioner:
Christopher Smith
Respondent:
S. Merlak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Booth v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC. et al
as 2:2016cv00046
Plaintiff:
Troy Booth
Defendant:
Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC., Christopher Smith and Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith v. Warden of Toledo Correctional Institution
as 1:2012cv00425
Petitioner:
Christopher Smith
Respondent:
Warden of Toledo Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Warden of Toledo Correctional Institution
as 3:2012cv01330
Petitioner:
Christopher Smith
Respondent:
Warden of Toledo Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 1:2010cv00841
Petitioner:
Christopher Smith
Respondent:
Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
