Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jennings v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01165
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome Jennings
Defendant:
Christopher Smith, Justin Gable, Jeremy Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv01630
Defendant:
I and I, Alabama Department of Corrections, M. C. Dawkins and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00743
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Randall Sandlin, Staff Attorneys and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Harrison v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv01904
Plaintiff:
Venture Harrison
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections , Jefferson S Dunn , Carter Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al(MAG2)
as 2:2016cv00686
Plaintiff:
Venture Harrison
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections , Jefferson S. Dunn , Carter Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Murray et al
as 4:2016cv01005
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Defendant:
Lester Murray, Lt. Taylor, C.O. McLemore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Smith v. Estes et al
as 5:2013cv02185
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Defendant:
Dewayne Estes, Sean Bright and K Hollingsworth
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
