Farley v. Virga, et al
Leonard Farley |
Cho, C. Chappell, Sahota, J. Lizarraga, Tim Virga, V. Mini, Bal and C. Cannedy |
2:2011cv01830 |
July 12, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Kendall J. Newman |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/30/13 RECOMMENDING that defendants' motion to dismiss 38 be granted, and plaintiff's claims be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J Mueller; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 42 ORDER ADOPTING 36 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in part signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/19/13. 33 Motion for Injunctive Relief is DENIED. (Manzer, C) |
Filing 37 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/26/12 ORDERING 35 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are adopted in full; 30 Motion is denied; and defendants shall file an answer within 14 days from the dare of this order. (Matson, R) |
Filing 36 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/21/2012 RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's 33 motion for injunctive relief be denied. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 35 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/25/12 ORDERING the clerk of the court shall randomly assign a District Judge to this action. U.S. District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller randomly assigned to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendants' 05/22/12 motion 30 be denied; and defendants be directed to file an answer within 14 days from any order by the district court adopting the instant findings and recommendations. MOTION 30 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 23 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/10/2012 ORDERING that plaintiff's 22 motion for injunctive relief is DENIED without prejudice. (Yin, K) |
Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/24/2012 ORDERING that the 15 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED; plaintiff is granted 30 days to submit the forms and documents required by this court's 12/27/11 order; the clerk to send plaintiff forms for service to be completed and returned within 30 days, along with the Notice of Submission. (Yin, K) |
Filing 15 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 02/07/12 ordering that within 21 days, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/8/11 ORDERING that 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED without prejudice. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/26/2011 ORDERING that within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission and submit the following documents to the court: A complete Appli cation to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner and a certified copy of plaintiff's prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice.(Duong, D) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.