Cases 1 - 10 of 171
Williamson v. Sahota et al
as 4:2025cv00159
Plaintiff:
Deborah D. Williamson
Defendant:
Monrose Singh Sahota, Sunny Singh Sahota and Mandeep Kaur Sahota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Sahota v Clark County et al
as 3:2025cv05054
Plaintiff:
Dawnese Sahota and Estate of Donald Sahota
Defendant:
Jonathan Feller and Clark County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
(PC) Gallegos v. Sahota et al

as 2:2024cv02776
Defendant:
Babbala, Sahota, R. Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Robert Gallegos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alliance Energy LLC v. Sahota et al
as 1:2024cv11168
Plaintiff:
Alliance Energy LLC
Defendant:
Sarbjeet Sahota, Carl SKJ Properties VIII LLC and SKJ Properties VIII LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1730 Collection Under Contract Guaranty
In re: Subpoena Directed to Sandeep Sahota by Crowe LLP
as 3:2024mc80040
Not Yet Classified:
Sandeep Sahota
Respondent:
Crowe LLP
Sahota et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Satwant S. Sahota and Jasdee Shanker
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Deprinzio v. Sahota et al
as 2:2023cv00621
Defendant:
Chandra Sahota, Deja Wright, Sandra Soldan and others
Plaintiff:
Terri M Deprinzio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Hill v. Cross et al

as 2:2022cv01464
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
Ada R. Cross, Counselor Contreas, P. Sahota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Cross et al

as 4:2022cv04196
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
Ada R. Cross, Counselor Contreas, P. Sahota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.