Roach v. Hill
Petitioner: Roy Roach
Respondent: R. Hill
Case Number: 2:2011cv02286
Filed: August 29, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: John F. Moulds
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 11/1/12: Recommending that petitioner's sixth claim for relief be dismissed as moot. The Clerk of the Court be directed to enter judgment and the district court decline to issue a certificate of appealability.F&R referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)
September 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/26/12 ORDERING 17 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are adopted in full; 12 Motion to Dismiss is denied as to respondent's contention that this action is barred by the statute of limitations; Res pondent's October 28, 2011 motion to dismiss is granted as to petitioner's first, second, third, and eighth claims for relief, as well as that part of petitioner's fourth claim for relief in which petitioner contends that his sentence has been converted to life without the possibility of parole, and said claims are dismissed; Petitioner's fifth and seventh claims for relief and that aspect of petitioner's fourth claim for relief in which he contends that his sentence vi olates the Eighth Amendment are dismissed; and This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for findings andrecommendations on whether petitioner's sixth claim for relief is moot and whether this court should issue a certificate of appealability. (Matson, R)
August 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 8/7/12 ORDERING that within 14 days from the date of this order the parties shall show cause in writing, if any they have, whypetitioners sixth claim, i n which he contends that the application of Marsys Law at his 2009 parole hearing violated the Ex Post Facto Clause, should not be dismissed as moot; and RECOMMENDING that Respondents October 28, 2011 motion to dismiss be denied as to respondents con tention that this action is barred by the statute of limitations; Respondents October 28, 2011 motion to dismiss be granted as to petitioners first, second, third, fourth and eighth claims for relief and said claims be dismissed; and Petitioners fourth, fifth, and seventh claims for relief be dismissed. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)
September 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting 2 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 9/13/11. Respondent is directed to file an answer within 45 days from the date of this order. Petitioner's traverse, if any, is due on or before 30 days from the date respondent's answer is filed. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus and an Order Re Consent or Request for Reassignment on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General. (Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roach v. Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Roy Roach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: R. Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?