Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 286
Keith Washington v. Minnesota DOC, et al
as 24-1962
Plaintiff: Keith Eugene Washington, also known as Monroe Bernard Washington
Defendant: Minnesota Department of Corrections, Supervisor Officials, sued in their individual capacities, MCF Oak Park Heights, MCF Stillwater and others
JENKINS v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 1:2024cv00591
Plaintiff: ALAN W. JENKINS
Defendant: CENTURION HEALTH, MERSHON, REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Hills v. USA
as 24-3236
Petitioner: EDWARD R. HILLS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hill v. Jackson
as 3:2024cv00143
Plaintiff: Tameka R. Hill
Defendant: Willie C. Jackson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
VASQUEZ v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff: MARIO RAMIREZ VASQUEZ
Defendant: CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, JOHN MERSHON, STEPHEN R. HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hills v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff: Sharee R. Hills
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hill v. Nealey Foods
as 1:2023cv17160
Plaintiff: Nichole R Hill
Defendant: Nealey Foods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Elizabeth De Coster et al v. Newegg, Inc.
as 2:2023mc00166
Plaintiff: Elizabeth De Coster, Maya Gold, John Mariane and others
Defendant: Newegg, Inc.
Hills v. USA
as 1:2023cv01644
Petitioner: Edward R. Hills
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
MCREYNOLDS v. LYLES et al
as 1:2023cv00212
Plaintiff: BLAKE AUSTIN MCREYNOLDS
Defendant: CORRECTIONS OFFICER J LYLES, SERGEANT D COURTOT, NURSE JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?