Johnson v. Clays et al
Plaintiff: Luis Reynaldo Johnson
Defendant: D. Clays, R. L. Harrington, William Knipp, J. P. White, D. Baker and Speer
Case Number: 2:2011cv02881
Filed: November 1, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Amador
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 143 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/16/2015 DENYING plaintiff's 136 motion to amend the complaint and stay this action; and DENYING plaintiff's 138 motion for attorney's fees. (Yin, K)
September 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/11/2015 DENYING as untimely plaintiff's 120 motion for summary judgment ; DENYING plaintiff's 130 motion to strike; DENYING plaintiff's 131 m otion for leave to file a surreply; and defendants' 125 evidentiary objections insofar as they are relevant to the court's disposition of the pending motion for summary judgment are OVERRULED. IT IS RECOMMENDED that defendants' 110 motion for summary judgment be granted; and this action be closed. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 7 days. (Yin, K)
July 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/24/15 ordering plaintiff's motion to join E. Hobbs to this action 99 is denied. Plaintiff's motion to join D. Clays to this action 116 is denied. Plaintiff's motion to compel [ 100] is denied. Plaintiff's motion to allow for garnishment proceedings 105 is denied. Plaintiff's motion based on the unclean hands doctrine 106 is denied. Within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff's motion to strike defendants' reply 115 is denied. (Plummer, M)
August 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/31/14 ordering plaintiff's motion for a protective order that prohibits defendants from using or asking about plaintiff's commitment offense during discovery 90 is denied. Plaintiff 9;s motion to strike 94 is denied. Defendants' request to seal plaintiff's amended abstract of judgment dated 02/01/89 attached as exhibit A to defendants' opposition to plaintiff's motion for a protective order 93 is granted . The clerk of the court is directed to file under seal the amended abstract of judgment date 02/01/89, attached as Exhibit A to defendants' opposition to plaintiff's motion for a protective order, until further ordered by the court. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 91 is denied. (Plummer, M)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/3/14 ORDERING that Plaintiffs motion for a temporary restraining order preventing the Attorney General from representing defendants in this action based on a conflict of interest (Doc. No. 62 ) is DENIED; Plaintiffs motion to find defendants in default for failing to oppose his motion for a temporary restraining order and motion for sanctions (Doc. Nos. 67 & 73 ) are DENIED; Plaintiffs motion for a stay (Doc. No. 83 ) is DENIED; Plaint iffs motion for preliminary injunctive relief (Doc. No. 80 ) is DENIED; Plaintiffs motion in limine is DENIED (Doc. No. 82 ) without prejudice to its renewal, as appropriate, at a later stage of these proceedings; and Plaintiffs motion for a settlement (Doc. No. 84 ) is DENIED.(Dillon, M)
May 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/20/14 ADOPTING IN FULL 76 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 37 Motion to Revoke Plaintiff's IFP Status; DENYING AS UNNECESSARY 53 Motion for Relief from Section 1915(g). Defendants are DIRECTED to file a responsive pleading in this matter within 30 days of the date of this order. (Meuleman, A)
April 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 76 AMENDED ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/22/2014 VACATING the 58 findings and recommendations filed 12/10/2013; and RECOMMENDING that defendants' 37 motion to revoke plaintiff's IF P status be denied; plaintiff's 53 motion for relief from § 1915(g) status be denied as unnecessary; and defendants be directed to file a responsive pleading in this matter within 30 days of any order adopting these findings and recommendations. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
December 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/09/13 ORDERING plaintiff's motion for defendants to stipulate to 12 material facts in dispute 41 is denied. Plaintiff's motion for entry of final judgm ent against defendants Clays, Harrington, White and Knipp 42 is denied. Plaintiff's motions for sanctions and to declare default against defendants 47 and 49 are denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendants' motion to revoke plaintiff 's IFP status pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g) 37 be denied. Plaintiff's motion for relief from section 1915(g) 53 be denied as unnecessary; and defendants be directed to file a responsive pleading in this matter within 30 days of any order adopting these findings and recommendations. Motions 37 and 53 referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
June 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/04/13 denying 32 Motion to Stay pending appeal. (Plummer, M)
April 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/12/2013 ORDERING that the 25 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED IN FULL. Defendants Clays, Harrington, Knipp, and White are DISMISSED from this action. (Zignago, K.)
March 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/14/2013 ORDERING that service is appropriate for D. Baker and Speer; the Clerk shall send plaintiff forms for service to be completed and returned within 30 days, along with the Notice of Submission; and RECOMMENDING that defendants Clays, Harrington, Knipp and White be dismissed from this action. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
August 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/21/12 GRANTING 16 Motion for Reconsideration; upon reconsideration, the Magistrate Judge's 12 Order filed on 3/30/12 is AFFIRMED. (Manzer, C)
August 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/20/12 ORDERING that Plaintiffs motion to reinstate his claims 15 is DENIED; Within 30 days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint. Alternatively, if plain tiff wishes to proceed on his original complaint, he shall file a notice informing the court that he wishes to proceed with service of his original complaint against defendants Baker and Speer; Plaintiffs motion for the court to order service of his complaint on defendants Baker and Speer 21 is DENIED without prejudice; and Plaintiffs motion for the court to address his pending motions 19 is DENIED as unnecessary.(Dillon, M)
March 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Luis Reynaldo Johnson signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/29/2012. CDC is to collect monthly payments and forward to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC, Financial)(Yin, K)
November 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/22/11 DENYING without prejudice 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner for use in a civil rights action; and Plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided with this order. (Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Clays et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Luis Reynaldo Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Clays
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. L. Harrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Knipp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. P. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Speer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?