Cases 1 - 10 of 626
Wilson v. Stowers, et al.
as 24-1789
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WILSON
Defendant:
CAROL STOWERS, Peace Officer, individual; Peace Officer, official capacity, EILLERS, Lieutenant for New Life K9 Academy, BOLDEN and others
Bellard v. University of Texas
as 24-40161
Plaintiff:
Bobby Bellard, Craig Messick and Barbra Speer
Defendant:
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Peter W.T. Pisters, President, in his official and individual capacities, Rosanna Morris, Chief Operating Officer, in her official and individual capacities and others
Speer v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Susan Speer
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and The The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Gipson v. Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, et al
as 24-3049
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIPSON
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, HAMILTON COUNTY, OH SHERIFF'S OFFICE, CHARMAINE MCGUFFEY and others
SPEERS v. OLYMPUS SPORTS LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
BRENDAN SPEERS
Defendant:
OLYMPUS SPORTS LLC and TODD BEAMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Williams v. Kuhn et al
as 3:2023cv01566
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Williams
Defendant:
Nicholas Kuhn, James Smith, Timothy Speer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3958
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3948
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
