HICA Education Loan Corporation v. Adams
Plaintiff: HICA Education Loan Corporation
Defendant: James C. Adams
Case Number: 2:2011cv02964
Filed: November 7, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 1819
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/6/12 DISMISSING case without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)
May 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/22/2012 ORDERING 20 Within 21 days of the date of this order, defendant shall file a response to plaintiff's request for voluntary dismissal of this action that indicates: defendant' s view regarding whether the dismissal should be with or without prejudice, and whether defendant seeks the imposition of any appropriate conditions on the dismissal sought by plaintiff; after receiving defendant's response, the undersigned will recommend the dismissal of this action on proper terms; Alternatively, within 14 days of the date of this order, the parties may file a stipulation of dismissal as provided in FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), which would effectuate the immediate dismissal of this case without a court order. (Reader, L)
February 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/7/12 ORDERING that plaintiff time filed a 14 statement of damages that satisfies the court that it may exercise, at least provisionally, diversity jurisdiction over plaintiff's claim re 13 Order requiring plaintiff to file a statement. (Donati, J)
February 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/3/12: All law and motion, except as to discovery-related matters, shall be completed BY 6/28/12. All discovery shall be completed BY 5/18/12. Motions to compel dis covery must be heard not later than 5/3/12. Designation of Expert Witnesses is due BY 3/30/2012, and rebuttal expert disclosures, if any, shall be made on or before 4/30/12. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 8/24/2012 at 11:00 AM, and the Jury Trial is SET for 10/15/2012 at 09:00 AM, both in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Kastilahn, A)
January 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/17/12: Status (pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for 2/2/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. (Kaminski, H)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HICA Education Loan Corporation v. Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James C. Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HICA Education Loan Corporation
Represented By: John D. Guerrini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?