Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Adams v. Brunson et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2021cv00631
Plaintiff:
James C. Adams
Defendant:
Andre Brunson and Wayne Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Steele
as 4:2016cv01240
Petitioner:
James C Adams
Respondent:
Troy Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Steele
as 4:2016cv00870
Petitioner:
James C Adams
Respondent:
Troy Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01564
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00003
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HICA Education Loan Corporation v. Adams
as 2:2011cv02964
Plaintiff:
HICA Education Loan Corporation
Defendant:
James C. Adams
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
HICA Education Loan Corporation v. Adams
as 1:2011at00697
Plaintiff:
HICA Education Loan Corporation
Defendant:
James C. Adams
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
ADAMS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv56413
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. ADAMS, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
OSTERHOLT et al v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2010cv00800
Defendant:
DRUCILLA M. ADAMS, JAMES C. ADAMS and THE TULIP COMPANY
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK J. GREEN and ROBBERT OSTERHOLT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
United States of America v. $30,874.27 Cashier''s Check Representing Proceeds from the Sale of James C. Adams II's Residence Located at 3751 S. Knik Goose Bay Road Wasilla, Alaska 99654
as 3:2009cv00007
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$30,874.27 Cashier''s Check Representing Proceeds from the Sale of James C. Adams II's Residence Located at 3751 S. Knik Goose Bay Road Wasilla, Alaska 99654
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
