Armstrong v. Young et al
Brady K. Armstrong |
Chandler, Turner, T. Brewer and D. Young |
2:2012cv00123 |
January 17, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Kings |
Kendall J. Newman |
Garland E. Burrell |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 65 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/9/14 RECOMMENDING that plaintiff claims against defendants Turner and Young be dismissed with prejudice on res judicata grounds; Plaintiff's claims against John Doe be dismissed without prejudice; and the Clerk of Court be directed to terminate this action. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 59 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/7/2013 VACATING 51 Findings and Recommendations; PARTIALLY GRANTING 55 Motion for Reconsideration; GRANTING Plaintiff thirty days to file a response to 47 Order to Show Cause. (Michel, G) |
Filing 58 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/2/2013 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 49 are ADOPTED in FULL; and plaintiff's 48 request for injunctive relief is DENIED without prejudice. (Reader, L) |
Filing 53 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/20/13 DENYING without prejudice 52 Motion. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 51 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/7/13 RECOMMENDING that Plaintiff claims against defendants Turner and Young be dismissed with prejudice on res judicata grounds; Plaintiffs claims against John Doe be dismissed without prejudice based on plaintiffs failure to first exhaust administrative remedies; and the Clerk of Court be directed to terminate this action. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 50 ORDER adopting 46 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/26/13: Defendant Chandler's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 29) is granted. Defendant Chandler is dismissed from this action. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 49 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/16/2013 RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's 48 request for injunctive relief be denied without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 47 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/28/13 ordering within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause why: a) Defendants Turner and Young should not be dismissed based on res judicata grounds; and b) Defendant John Doe should not be dismissed based on plaintiff's failure to first exhaust administrative remedies. Plaintiff's motion for court intervention 39 is denied without prejudice. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 46 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/26/13 recommending that defendant Chandler's motion to dismiss 29 be granted and defendant Chandler be dismissed from this action. Motion 29 referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/11/2013 ORDERING that, within 30 days, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the 29 motion to dismiss. (Yin, K) |
Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/24/12 ORDERING that defendant Brewer is dismissed from this action. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/28/12 ORDERING that 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are VACATED; 16 Motion for Extension of time is GRANTED; Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to comply with this courts May 1, 2012 order.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 15 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/13/12 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 14 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/30/12 ORDERING the director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the prison trust account of Brady K. Armstrong to the clerk until the balance of $350 i s paid in full. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and the plaintiff's IFP on the Director of the CDC. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the financial department of the court. (cc Financial, CDC Prisoner Payment Orders )(Dillon, M) |
Filing 9 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/27/2012 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/21/12 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, the completed certificate portion of the application form. (Dkt. No. 7 at 2.) Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/26/12. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.