Cases 1 - 10 of 4,457
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act
Chandler v. O.M.A. Construction, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00815
Plaintiff:
Beau Chandler
Defendant:
O.M.A. Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Chandler v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.
as 4:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Mary Shelley Chandler
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Chandler v. Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
as 8:2023cv02286
Petitioner:
Edward Terrell Chandler
Respondent:
Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dutton v. Shaffer et al
as 3:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Donna Dutton
Defendant:
Hon. Jimmy Shaffer, Hon. R. Michael Sullivan, Hon. Jeff S. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chandler v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv21891
Plaintiff:
Ronald Chandler
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections
Chandler v. Hooper
as 6:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CREAMER v. FORD et al
as 5:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
SEAN LEE CREAMER
Defendant:
TOMMY FORD, JEFFERY BENNETT, DAVID HIGGINS, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Fine et al
as 2:2023cv02325
Plaintiff:
Rashad Chandler
Defendant:
Sergeant Robert Fine, Lieutenant F/N/U Ivory, Sergeant F/N/U Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00574
Petitioner:
Ronald Chandler
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
