Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Stevens v. Chandler et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Tyler William Stevens
Defendant:
Brian Chandler, FNU Walltrip, Board of Pardons and others
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rycar Trust et al v. Yates Family Investments et al
as 2:2023cv00732
Defendant:
Yates Family Investments, Timmer Family Investments, Yates Family Investments, LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Rycar Trust, RTM5 Trust and Ryan Thomas Management Company
Darkpulse v. Brunson Chandler Jones et al
as 2:2022cv00458
Plaintiff:
Darkpulse
Defendant:
Brunson Chandler Jones and Lance B Brunson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Sanchez v. Lyman et al
as 2:2018cv00069
Plaintiff:
Greg Paul Revere Sanchez
Defendant:
Paul Lyman, FNU Woolsey, Cameran Noel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson et al v. Rees et al
as 2:2016cv00074
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thompson and OTC Solutions
Defendant:
David Rees, Chase Chandler and Vincent & Rees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00027
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Rose v. Hancock et al
as 1:2012cv00110
Plaintiff:
Chandler Russell Rose
Defendant:
K. Hancock , Jason Richards and J. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Mortgage it et al
as 2:2009cv00618
Plaintiff:
Merrill Ray Chandler
Defendant:
Mortgage it, Citimortgage, Eagle Gate Financial Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
