Singh et al v. Heinauer et al
| Randir Singh and Ranjit Singh |
| Gerard Heinauer, Michael C. Biggs, Alejandro Mayorkas, USCIS, Janet Napolitano and Eric H. Holder, Jr. |
| 2:2012cv00659 |
| March 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| William B. Shubb |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
STIPULATION and ORDER Re Second Extension of Time 12 signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 7/6/2012: The government's time to file an answer to the complaint, as well as the time for filing the Joint Status Report, is extended to 9/17/2012. The Scheduling Conference is reset for 10/1/2012 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
11
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 5/21/12: The government's time to file an answer to the complaint, as well as the time for filing the Joint Status Report, is extended to July 16, 2012. Initial Scheduling Conference RESET for 8/6/2012 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER of RECUSAL signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/23/12. Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows for all further proceedings. (Manzer, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
