Pitts v. Cates et al
| Eddie L. Pitts |
| M. Cates, G. Swarthout, K. Starke, R. Baughman, J. Peterson, R. W. Cappel, N. Hardy, C. Author, D. Blackwell and A. Freese |
| 2:2012cv01310 |
| May 15, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/04/17 ORDERING the Custodian to produce Eddie L. Pitts on 11/02/17 at 1:00 P.M. in courtroom 25 before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Custodian is ordered to notify the court of any changes in custody and to provided new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian and Out-to-Court Desk. (cc: KJN and OTCD) (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 09/23/15 ordering plaintiff's motion for service by publication 26 is denied. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time 27 is granted; and defendants motion for a screening order 30 is granted. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/09/14 granting 21 Motion for Extension of time. The time for defendants' response thereto is extended accordingly. Plaintiff may also file an application to proceed in forma pauperis o n or before 12/20/14. As previously ordered, if no amended complaint is received on or before the deadline set herin, this action will continued on plaintiff's original complaint against defendants Cates, Swarthout, Starke, Peterson, Cappel, Hardy, Author, Blackwell and Freese but not Baughman. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/31/14 ordering plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of service of this order. If plaintiff chooses not to file an amended complaint, this action will proceed aga inst defendants Cates, Swarthout, Starke, Peterson, Cappel, Hardy, Author, Blackwell and Freese. If no amended complaint is filed within 30 days of the date of this order, defendants shall file a response to the complaint within 30 days thereafter. If plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, the court will issue a separate order setting a response deadline for the defendants. Within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall inform the court as to the status of service as to de fendants Cates, Starke and Freese. If plaintiff needs assistance to complete service as to defendants Cates, Starke, and/or Freese, he may submit within 30 days from the date of this order, an application to proceed in forma pauperis and request that the U.S. Marshal assist in completing service of process. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff a form application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
