Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Blackwell v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00581
Petitioner:
Ryan D Blackwell
Respondent:
Richard Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blackwell v. McKissick et al
as 1:2023cv03571
Plaintiff:
Maria D. Blackwell
Defendant:
Robert J. McKissick, Lake Erie Transport, LLC and DB Insurance Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
(PC) Welk v. CA. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
CA. Dept. of Corrections, Robert Mayes, Mejorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackwell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01076
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jackie D. Blackwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Albert Hamilton v. M. Armstrong, et al
as 20-15284
Defendant / Appellee:
J. RANKIN, G. HERNANDEZ, CHASTAIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT J. HAMILTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00030
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
(PC) Burgos v. Primm et al
as 2:2019cv01278
Defendant:
Robert Cogburn, D. Blackwell, Michael Lew and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Burgos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alejandro Prado v. Gary Swarthout, et al
as 19-15985
Defendant:
HAMMOND, Appeals Examiner, J. JIMENEZ, Lieutenant, ALLEAN, Appeals Examiner and others
Defendant / Appellee:
D. BLACKWELL, Lieutenant, E. ARNOLD, Deputy Warden, GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEJANDRO PRADO
(PC) Hamilton v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2019cv00445
Defendant:
M Armstrong, Lee, Funforunn and others
Plaintiff:
Albert J. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witkin v. Blackwell et al
as 2:2017cv02692
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Witkin
Defendant:
D. Blackwell, S. Moss, T. Wamble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
