Shadd et al v. County Sacramento et al
| Marvin Shadd, Psyche Hayes, Gage Quinones, Vernon Tidwell, Orlindo Myles, Carl C Randolph, Joseph Anthony Nunez and Oscar Constancio |
| County Sacramento, Don Meyer, Tracy Bennett, Wilbon, Peralta, Greenhall, Lopez, Heinz, Arroyo, Carlos Smith, Ronald Earp, Tiara, Sanchez, Ballas, Jose Cervantes, Balls and Verne Speirs |
| 2:2012cv02834 |
| November 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Morrison C. England |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/9/2015 GRANTING 83 Stipulation for Dismissal; DISMISSING the four consolidated cases. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
82
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/12/14: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 1/12/2016. Discovery due by 11/12/2015. Dispositive Motions filed by 5/12/2016. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/21/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. Jury Trial set for 9/12/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/3/2014 GRANTING 80 Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel; TERMINATING Attorney Daniel Mark Siegel. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/11/14 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' MOTION to COMPEL 73 is DENIED without prejudice. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/25/14 re: 67 Order. Plaintiffs were given one final opportunity to file an amended consolidated Complaint and were instructed that the failure to timely file a Fourth Amended Complaint would result, without further notice to the parties, in the dismissal of certain parties and claims with prejudice. Plaintiffs failed to file an amended Complaint within the time permitted. Therefore, the parties and causes of actions dismissed in that O rder are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Those defendants who have not yet responded to Plaintiffs' 55 Third Amended Complaint, are ORDERED to do so within 14 days of the electronic filing of this Order. In addition, within 30 days of the electro nic filing of this Order, all parties are ORDERED to prepare and submit to the Court one consolidated joint status report that includes a Rule 26(f) discovery plan, as well as the other information required by 5 Order. Upon receipt of that status report, the Court will issue a Pretrial Scheduling Order. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/26/14 ORDERING that Defendant Earp's MOTION to DISMISS 57 is DENIED; Defendants' MOTION to Strike 58 is DENIED; and Defendants' MOTION to DISMISS 59 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part with leave to amend. Plaintiffs may (but are not required to) file an Fourth Amended Complaint not later than twenty (20) days following the date this Order is electronically filed. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 12/3/13 ORDERING that Defendants' 47 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with leave to amend. Plaintiffs must, in any amended complaint, clearly indicate which Plaintiffs, claims, and Defendants correspond to each of the four separate cases, and clearly identify them accordingly. If no amended complaint is filed within 21 days of the date this order is electronically filed, the causes of action dismissed pursuant to this Order will be dismissed with prejudice. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting 32 Motion for Extension of time signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/20/13. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 8/21/2013. Court is GRANTING defendants' 14 Motion to Dismiss 6 First Amended Complaint without prejudice. If no Amended Complaint is filed within 21 days of date this Order is electro nically filed, causes of action against Sacramento, Speirs, Meyer, and the other defendants who have not appeared in this case and challenged the pleadings will be dismissed with prejudice. Because Probation Staff Wilbon, Probation Staff Carlos Smith, Probation Officer Ronald Earp, andProbation Staff Jose Cervantes filed 35 36 37 Answers, not Motions to Dismiss, the causes of action against those defendants will remain. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/1/13 GRANTING 7 Ex Parte Application to Extend the Time for Service of the Complaint. It is hereby ORDERED that the time for service of the complaint on defendants is EXTENDED until 7/17/13. (Meuleman, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
