Cases 1 - 10 of 930
Hendrix v. Rodriguez, et al
as 1:2024cv12688
Defendant:
Lindsay Garcia, S. Rodriguez, J. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Velasco v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company, LLC
as 3:2024cv08840
Defendant:
Kraft Heinz Foods Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Maria Velasco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Heinze v. Canak et al
as 1:2024cv12578
Plaintiff:
Christopher Heinze
Defendant:
Filip Canak and Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11875
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Smith v. Cevallos-Vera et al
as 2:2024cv02897
Unknown:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Bruce Smith
Defendant:
Heinz Cevallos-Vera, GDS Transport, LLC and Reliance Transport, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03301
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Scott v. Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.
as 24-6591
Defendant:
ROBERT ASHCRAFT, ECF No. 17, MEGHAN SULLIVAN, Added per FAC, ECF No. 19; Dismissed per 20, JOHN HENLEY, ECF No. 17: Added per FAC, ECF No. 19 and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD SCOTT, III
Mikal Jefferson v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company, LLC
as 5:2024cv02278
Defendant:
Kraft Heinz Foods Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mikal Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
