Ashmore v. Walgreens
| Gregory Ashmore |
| Walgreens and Diane Burns |
| 2:2013cv00159 |
| January 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/5/13 ORDERING that all law and motion, except as to discovery, shall be completed by 1/17/2014; all discovery shall be completed by 11/29/2013; plaintiff's Designat ion of Expert Witnesses is due by 10/4/2013, defendant's Designation of Expert Witnesses is due by 10/18/2013, and plaintiff's disclosure of any reubttal experts is due by 10/25/2013; Final Pretrial Conference is set for 3/20/2014 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; A Bench Trial is set for 5/12/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER SETTING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/6/13: Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for 4/5/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or before March 22, 2013, and defendant shall file and serve a status report on or before March 29, 2013. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
