Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Walgreen Co. v. Revolution Beauty, Inc.
as 1:2026cv07493
Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co.
Defendant:
Revolution Beauty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Williams v. Walgreens
as 4:2026cv01031
Plaintiff:
Eric Williams
Defendant:
Walgreens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Bates v. Walgreen Co.
as 2:2026cv00769
Plaintiff:
Alec Bates
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Sturdivant v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al
as 1:2026cv07469
Plaintiff:
Loretta Sturdivant
Defendant:
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Philip Morris USA Inc., LIGGETT GROUP LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Williams v. Walgreen Co Inc
as 2:2026cv01081
Plaintiff:
Laura Williams
Defendant:
Walgreen Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) v. WALGREEN CO.
as 1:2026cv02243
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Preston v. Organic Smoke Shop et al
as 1:2026cv03794
Plaintiff:
Ebony Marsha Preston
Defendant:
Organic Smoke Shop, Yosef Hackner, Baruch Sirota and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GMEZ et al
as 3:2026cv01394
Plaintiff:
WANDA GMEZ and A.L. G
Defendant:
Walgreens of Puerto Rico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Macklin v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 2:2026cv02696
Plaintiff:
Vincent Macklin
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and Walgreens Holding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
