Morris v. Guffee, et al.
| Leon E. Morris |
| Guffee, A. Low, J. Brewer, A. Cruz, K. Brown, G. Hernandez and D. Crawford |
| 2:2013cv01171 |
| June 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/07/15 recommending that this action be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(b). Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 7 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/7/15 ORDERING that The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve plaintiff with a courtesy copy of defendant Guffee's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 33 ); and within 14 days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to defendant Guffee's motion to dismiss.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/11/15 ordering within 14 days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to both pending motions to dismiss in this case. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 41 is denied. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/15/15 denying 37 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/13/15 ORDERING that Plaintiffs motion for an extension of time 31 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted up to and including May 31, 2015, in which to file an opposition to defendants Low, Brewer, Brown, Hernandez and Cruzs motion to dismiss. Defendants Low, Brewer, Brown, Hernandez and Cruzs reply, if any, shall be filed within seven days thereafter. Plaintiff is granted up to and including May 31, 2015, in which to file an opposition to def endant Guffees motion to dismiss. Defendant Guffees reply, if any, shall be filed within seven days thereafter. No further extensions of time will be granted. Plaintiffs motion for the appointment of counsel 32 is DENIED without prejudice.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
14
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/9/14 RECOMMENDING that the Amended Complaint be dismissed, without leave to amend, for failure to state a claim; and this case be closed. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/22/2013 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Leon E. Morris. Clerk to send a copy of this order and IFP on Department of Corrections and this order on Financial. (cc Financial and CDC) (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/07/13 denying 7 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff shall within 30 days after service of this order, submit the full filing fee of $350.00 for pursuing a prisoner civil rights action. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/21/13 ORDERING that plaintiff shall, within 30 days after the filing date of this order, submit an application in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis, on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, OR the full filing fee; and Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
