Cases 1 - 10 of 189
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Karie Simmons v. Christopher Alston, et al
as 23-35517
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KARIE A. SIMMONS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER M. ALSTON, GINA ZADRA WALTON, Clerk, TOM B. PIERCE, Bar No. 26730 and others
Simmons v. Alston et al
as 2:2023cv01076
Plaintiff:
Karie A Simmons
Defendant:
Christopher M Alston, Gina Zadra Walton, Tom B Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Crawford v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08402
Plaintiff:
Mark D Crawford
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Erickson et al
as 3:2023cv05575
Plaintiff:
Brent Arthur Wilson
Defendant:
Lauren Erickson, Scott D Crawford, Mark DeRousie and others
CRAWFORD v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12759
Plaintiff:
Philip D. Crawford and PHILIP D CRAWFORD
Defendant:
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION and USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Crawford v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01034
Plaintiff:
Arlie D. Crawford
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
CRAWFORD v. GARLAND
as 5:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D CRAWFORD and ASIA CRAWFORD
Defendant:
COLETTE PETERS and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Antonio Crawford v. Colette Peters, et al
as 23-15371
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO D. CRAWFORD, AKA Asia
Defendant / Appellee:
COLETTE PETERS, BOP Director and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
