Cases 1 - 10 of 16
(PC) Tamrat v. CA Health Care Facility-Administration et al
as 2:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Herman Tamrat
Defendant:
California Health Care Facility-Administration, Chief Medical Office Doe, D. Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. City of Lemon Grove et al
as 3:2021cv01966
Plaintiff:
Joe D Crawford
Defendant:
City of Lemon Grove, Jennifer Mendoza, Jerry Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Antonio D. Crawford v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv03545
Petitioner:
Antonio D. Crawford
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Morris v. Petersen et al
as 3:2015cv02169
Plaintiff:
Leon Eugene Morris
Defendant:
Petersen, Manzo, Begley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Guffee, et al.
as 2:2013cv01171
Plaintiff:
Leon E. Morris
Defendant:
Guffee, A. Low, J. Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Jennings et al.
as 2:2013cv01134
Plaintiff:
Leon E. Morris
Defendant:
Jennings, Lee, Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Guffee et al
as 2:2013cv00434
Plaintiff:
Leon E. Morris
Defendant:
A. Guffee, A. Cruz, G. Low and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Jennings et al
as 2:2012cv02240
Plaintiff:
Leon E. Morris
Defendant:
Jennings, Lee, G. Whitted and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Petersen et al
as 4:2012cv02480
Plaintiff:
Leon E. Morris
Defendant:
Petersen, Manzo, Kessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William A Niese et al v. Chandler Trust No 1 et al
as 2:2011cv07577
Defendant:
Prism Partners I, L.P., Prism Partners III Leveraged, L.P., Philip Chandler and others
Plaintiff:
William A Niese, Judge James R Simpson, W Thomas Johnson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
