Harrison v. Linde, et. al.
| Carl F. Harrison |
| Linde, DeBoard and Simpson |
| 2:2013cv01510 |
| July 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/1/15 ORDERING that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, 98 is granted. The order filed 3/31/15 is amended at page 1:22-25, to reflect that plaintiff was granted a fourteen day extension of time to file objections on 3/5/15 92 and that his 3/19/15 objections were timely filed. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/5/2015 GRANTING in part and DENYING in part plaintiff's 91 motion: plaintiff is GRANTED 14 days to file objections to the findings and recommendations, no further extensions of time will be granted; and plaintiff's motion is otherwise DENIED. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
90
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/30/2015 RECOMMENDING that defendants' 79 motion for summary judgment be granted. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/2/2014 ORDERING the Clerk to re-designate ECF No. 81 as a "Motion for Continuance Pursuant to Rule 56(d)", and that motion is DENIED; plaintiff's 82 motion for an extension of time is GRANTED; plaintiff has 30 days to file an opposition to summary judgment; and plaintiff's 84 request for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/30/14 ORDERING that the deadline for the parties to file dispositive motions is extended to 5/5/14. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/7/14 GRANTING 75 Motion ; the deadline for the parties to file dispositive motions is extended to April 25, 2014.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/18/2013 ORDERING that plaintiff's 52 motion to compel discovery is DENIED; plaintiff's 55 motion for law library access is DENIED; plaintiff's 58 motion for discover y is DENIED; and plaintiff's 59 motion for additional interrogatories is DENIED. Plaintiff may only file the following documents: (a) One dispositive motion, limited to one memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion and one reply to any opposition; (b) One opposition to any motion filed by defendants (and clearly titled as such); (c) Only one non-dispositive motion pending at any time, plaintiff is limited to one memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion and one reply to any opposition; and (d) One set of objections to any future findings and recommendations. Failure to comply with this order shall result in improperly filed documents being stricken from the record and may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/4/2013 DENYING plaintiff's 53 request for the appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER denying 50 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 09/16/13. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
48
COPY OF ORDER filed in case 2:12-cv-2000 DENYING plaintiff's 41 , 42 motions for a court order to preserve evidence. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/25/13 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed February 25, 2013 30 and the findings and recommendations filed March 1, 2013 36 are adopted in full, except as ordered below; Plaintiff s motion for law library access 29 is DENIED; Defendants motion to sever 22 is GRANTED; The claims in 12-cv-02000 shall be severed into two separate actions. The current case number shall remain assigned to the claims against defendants DeBo ard and Lopez. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign a new case number for the claims against defendants Simpson and Linde, and assign the same district judge and magistrate judge as in this action. The filings from 12-cv-02000 shall be included on the dockets of each case; and the Clerk of the Court shall make an adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for the new cases filed as ordered above.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
