Cases 1 - 10 of 1,173
Pearcy v. Linde Gas & Equipment Inc.
as 4:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jacob Pearcy
Defendant:
Linde Gas & Equipment Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Lindblad v. Gas, et al.
as 24-1983
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LINDBLAD
Defendant:
LINDE GAS, STEVEN ANGEL and SANJIV LAMBA
United States of America v. Ameren Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00371
Defendant:
EEMSCO, Ameren Corporation, Barry Electric Cooperative and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
State of Missouri v. Ameren Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00374
Defendant:
Evansville Electric & Manufacturing Co., Inc., Progress Energy, National Grid USA Service Company and others
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
United States of America v. Ameren Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00047
Defendant:
EEMSCO, Ameren Corporation, Barry Electric Cooperative and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
State of Missouri v. Ameren Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Defendant:
Evansville Electric & Manufacturing Co., Inc., Progress Energy, National Grid USA Service Company and others
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri and United States on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Stine v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Katie Lynn Stine and Lind
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
