Dabek v. Walgreen Co.
Glenn Dabek |
Walgreen Co. |
United States of America and State of California |
2:2013cv02397 |
November 19, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Dale A. Drozd |
William B. Shubb |
Other Statutory Actions |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/25/2015 UNSEALING the 1 Complaint and ORDERING that it be served upon the defendant by the relator; ORDERING that all other contents of the Court's file in this action, except for this Order a nd the 22 Notice of Election to Decline Intervention, remain under seal; ORDERING the relator to serve this Order and the 22 Notice of Election to Decline Intervention upon the defendant only after service of the 1 Complaint; LIFTING the seal a s to all other matters occurring in this action after the date of this Order; ORDERING the parties to serve all pleadings and motions, including supporting memoranda, and all notices of appeal filed in this action upon the United States; ORDERING tha t all orders of this Court be served on the United States; NOTIFYING the relator and the defendant that the Court will provide the United States with notice and an opportunity to be heard prior to ruling on or granting its approval for any proposal that this action be dismissed, settled, or otherwise discontinued. (Michel, G.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.