Knanishu v. Spearman
| Kenneth Knanishu |
| Spearman |
| 2:2014cv00579 |
| February 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Luis Obispo |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 08/18/15 recommending that respondent's unopposed motion to dismiss 23 be granted. MOTION to DISMISS 23 referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/3/2014 VACATING the 8/15/14 findings and recommendations 17 ; respondent shall file a response to the amended petition within 60 days; and the Clerk shall serve a copy of this order, a copy of the amended petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (cc: Michael Farrell) (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
17
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/14/14 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/17/14 ORDERING that petitioner shall submit on the form provided by the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days from the date of this order, a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, with the certification required by Rule 3(a)(2), or pay the appropriate filing fee; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a new form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/11/14 ORDERING that this action is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison for all further proceedings; henceforth, the caption on documents filed in this action shall be shown as No. 2:14-cv-0579 CMK P; and the Clerk of the Court shall make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/12/2014 DISMISSING the petition and application to proceed IFP with leave to amend within 30 days, petitioner must file a new § 2254 petition and either a new application to proceed in forma pauperis or the $5.00 filing fee; and the Clerk shall send petitioner this court's form for filing a habeas corupus petition and an application to proceed ifp. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Knanishu v. Spearman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Kenneth Knanishu | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Spearman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
