Cases 1 - 10 of 1,208
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spearman et al v. AutoZone Stores LLC
as 7:2024cv01363
Plaintiff:
Carlos Spearman and Kisher Spearman
Defendant:
AutoZone Stores LLC a Corporation doing business as AutoZone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Spearman
as 24-469
Defendant:
HENRY HORTON, JAYQUAN MARTIN, KISHON SHIELDS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. William Spearman
as 24-10300
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM MICHAEL SPEARMAN
(PC) Sierra v. Covello et al
as 2:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sierra
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, E Baskerville, M. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sierra v. Covello et al
as 9:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sierra
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, E. Baskerville, M. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mack v. Director of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Director of Corrections, S. M. Rios, Xavier Bercerra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rufus Spearman v. Chad Williams, et al
as 23-2093
Plaintiff:
RUFUS LAMAR SAVIN SPEARMAN
Defendant:
CHAD H. WILLIAMS, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor, DAVID OSBORNE, Correctional Officer, JENNIFER GEHOSKI, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor and others
United States of America v. Spearman
as 4:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sandra Spearman
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
