Armstrong Development Properties, Inc. v. SG Ellison, et al
| Armstrong Development Properties, Inc. |
| SG Ellison, Peter G. Shimkus, Brandon M. Stein, William R. McDermott, Christopher Czyz, Alesha Karlsson, First Street Development, LLC, Mark Miller, David Grieve and Brett Del Valle |
| 2:2014cv00929 |
| April 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Morrison C. England |
| Commercial/ICC Rates/etc. |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/26/15. CASE CLOSED. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/2/15 ORDERING that this case shall remain STAYED. Not later than ninety (90) days following the date this Order is electronically filed, the parties are directed to file a joint status report advising the Court of the status of arbitration.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/14/2014 ORDERING 105 Based on the parties' representations that they will participate inmediation within the next 60 days prior to proceeding to arbitration, this case shall remain STAYED. Not later than 90 days following the date this Order is electronically filed, the parties are directed to file another Joint Status Report advising the Court of the status of their arbitration proceedings. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/30/2014 ORDERING 97 Motion to Stay is GRANTED, and the 7/24/2014 hearing on the matter is VACATED; This case is STAYED pending resolution of the parties' arbitratio proceedings. 85 M otion to Dismiss, 89 Motion to Dismiss, and 90 Motion to Dismiss are DENIED without prejudice to refiling once the stay is lifted, and the 7/10/2014 hearing on those motions is VACATED as well. Not later than 90 days following the date of this order, parties are directed to file a joint status report advising the court of the status of the arbitration. (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/24/2014 ORDERING Exhibit A to Plaintiffs Request to Seal Document (Complaint in Arbitration) submitted on June 2, 2014 (the Complaint in Arbitration), shall be filed UNDER SEAL, and shall be maintained under seal until this Court orders otherwise.(Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for the reasons stated more fully within, Defendants' Motions to Dismiss 41 , 44 , 46 are granted, in part, and denied, in part. Said Motions are granted to the extent that Defendants seek a transfer of this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Said Motions are denied, as moot, insofar as Defendants seek dismissal of ADPI's Amended Complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction or improper venue, and denied, without prejudice, to the extent they seek dismissal for failure to state a claim. An appropriate Order transferring this case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 4/14/14. (jg)[Transferred from pawd on 4/16/2014.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
