Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Foucha v. Martuscello III et al
as 1:2026cv05987
Petitioner:
Lesean Foucha
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello III and Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foucha v. Martuscello III et al
as 1:2026cv05883
Petitioner:
Lesean Foucha
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello III and Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Wakaliuk et al
as 3:2026cv00258
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christopher Wakaliuk, James Worden, Mark Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Bradshaw v. Miller
as 1:2026cv05351
Petitioner:
Jay Bradshaw
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foucha v. Martuscello III et al
as 1:2026cv05161
Petitioner:
Lesean Foucha
Defendant:
Daniel F. Martuscello III and Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. James et al
as 1:2026cv05167
Petitioner:
Zarnoff Taylor
Respondent:
Attorney General Letitia James and Superintendent Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lynch v. Miller et al
as 1:2026cv05153
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lynch
Defendant:
Mark Miller, Armond Caringi, Debra Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanding v. Martuscello III et al
as 1:2026cv04999
Plaintiff:
David Blanding
Defendant:
Daniel F. Martuscello III, Carol Moores, Susanna Nayshuler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. Miller
as 1:2026cv02400
Petitioner:
Charles Jordan
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Miller
as 1:2026cv03319
Petitioner:
Ricky Moore
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
