Cases 1 - 10 of 100
MILLER v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 1:2026cv00243
Plaintiff:
MARK MILLER
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Chacon v. Mark Miller -Superintendent of Greenhaven, CF
as 1:2026cv07969
Petitioner:
Luis Chacon
Respondent:
Mark Miller -Superintendent of Greenhaven, CF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Borden v. Miller et al
as 1:2026cv07597
Plaintiff:
Aaron Borden
Defendant:
Mark Miller, Sgt. Piper, Sgt. Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foucha v. Martuscello III et al
as 1:2026cv01753
Petitioner:
Lesean Foucha
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello III and Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foucha v. Martuscello III et al
as 1:2026cv01667
Petitioner:
Lesean Foucha
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello III and Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER et al v. AMERICAN ECONOMY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2026cv05668
Plaintiff:
JOYCE MILLER and MARK MILLER
Defendant:
AMERICAN ECONOMY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Foucha v. Martuscello III et al
as 1:2026cv01656
Petitioner:
Lesean Foucha
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello III and Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wade v. Doe 1
as 26-2134
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND WADE
Defendant:
Correction Officer JOHN DOE 1, Correction Officer JOHN DOE 2, Sgt. WEBER, Correction Officer and others
Chacon v. Mark Miller -Superintendent of Greenhaven, CF
as 1:2026cv04766
Petitioner:
Luis Chacon
Respondent:
Mark Miller -Superintendent of Greenhaven, CF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lagoa v. Miller
as 26-2071
Petitioner:
FELIX LAGOA
Respondent:
MARK MILLER, Superintendent NYS DOCCS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
