Williams v. Kaiser et al
Lonnie Williams |
D. Kaiser, D. Griffith, D. Bauer, M. Roberts, E. Bortolamedi, E. Vela and M. Whitehead |
2:2014cv01218 |
May 19, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Carolyn K. Delaney |
Morrison C. England |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/17/15 denying 17 Motion to Stay. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 12 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/01/14 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/15/14 DENYING 9 Motion to Proceed IFP; Plaintiff shall pay the $400 filing fee for this action within 30 days. Failure to pay the filing fee within 30 days will result in a recommendation that is action be dismissed without prejudice.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/27/14 ORDERING that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is DISMISSED without prejudice; The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; and Plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis.(Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.