Cases 1 - 10 of 100
PADILLA LINO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2026cv03281
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PADILLA LINO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK GARLAND, MATTHEW GRAVES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv50431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Spiegel v. Scott et al
as 1:2026cv00215
Plaintiff:
EDWARD SPIEGEL
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHAD D SCOTT and DEPUTY ROBERT CORTEZ RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00991
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00993
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bennett v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv02466
Plaintiff:
Robert Bennett
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
DOWNTON v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 1:2026cv02011
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. DOWNTON
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026at03494
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
ROBERTS v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv00623
Plaintiff:
JESSE ROBERTS
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Dapogny v. Douglas
as 6:2026cv01285
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Dapogny
Defendant:
Michael Douglas and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
