Mitchell v. Soto
Petitioner: Neano Mitchell
Respondent: John Soto
Case Number: 2:2014cv01438
Filed: June 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Presiding Judge: Troy L. Nunley
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 30 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/10/2015 RECOMMENDING that petitioner's 1 application for writ of habeas corpus be denied; and the District Court decline to issue a certificate of appealability. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
December 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/17/14 GRANTING 22 Motion to Proceed IFP. (Dillon, M)
December 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/12/14 ORDERING that Respondent's responsive pleading be filed on or before January 7, 2015.(Dillon, M)
October 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING 9 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/3/2014. Plaintiff's 8 Motion for Reconsideraton, construed as Motino for Relief from Judgment is GRANTED. The 6 Order of Dismissal and 7 Judgment entered 8/22/2014 is VACATED. The action shall proceed with service with Petition. [cc: Michael P. Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General] (Marciel, M)
September 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/24/2014 DIRECTING the Clerk to serve a copy of these findings and recommendations on the CA Attorney General; and RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's 8 mo tion for reconsideration filed on 9/8/2014, construed as a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) be granted; the 8/22/2014 order of dismissal and judgment be vacated; and this action proceed with service of the petition. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days. (cc: Michael Farrell)(Yin, K)
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 07/17/14 ORDERING the clerk shall assign a district judge to this case as petitioner has not filed a consent to the undersigned presiding. U.S. District Judge Tr oy L. Nunley randomly assigned to this action. The clerk of the court shall serve a copy of these findings and recommendations together with a copy of the petition filed in the instant case on the Attorney General of the State of California. Also, RECOMMENDING that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (cc: Michael Farrell, Attorney General)(Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchell v. Soto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Neano Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John Soto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?