Mitchell v. Soto
Neano Mitchell |
John Soto |
2:2014cv01438 |
June 16, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Gregory G. Hollows |
Troy L. Nunley |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/10/2015 RECOMMENDING that petitioner's 1 application for writ of habeas corpus be denied; and the District Court decline to issue a certificate of appealability. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/17/14 GRANTING 22 Motion to Proceed IFP. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/12/14 ORDERING that Respondent's responsive pleading be filed on or before January 7, 2015.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING 9 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/3/2014. Plaintiff's 8 Motion for Reconsideraton, construed as Motino for Relief from Judgment is GRANTED. The 6 Order of Dismissal and 7 Judgment entered 8/22/2014 is VACATED. The action shall proceed with service with Petition. [cc: Michael P. Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General] (Marciel, M) |
Filing 9 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/24/2014 DIRECTING the Clerk to serve a copy of these findings and recommendations on the CA Attorney General; and RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's 8 mo tion for reconsideration filed on 9/8/2014, construed as a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) be granted; the 8/22/2014 order of dismissal and judgment be vacated; and this action proceed with service of the petition. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days. (cc: Michael Farrell)(Yin, K) |
Filing 3 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 07/17/14 ORDERING the clerk shall assign a district judge to this case as petitioner has not filed a consent to the undersigned presiding. U.S. District Judge Tr oy L. Nunley randomly assigned to this action. The clerk of the court shall serve a copy of these findings and recommendations together with a copy of the petition filed in the instant case on the Attorney General of the State of California. Also, RECOMMENDING that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (cc: Michael Farrell, Attorney General)(Plummer, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mitchell v. Soto | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Neano Mitchell | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: John Soto | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.