Ashanti v. Obama et al
| Askia Ashanti |
| Barack Obama, Diane Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi, Eric Holder, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Lawrence K Karlton, Thelton Henderson, Stephen Rhinehardt, Kelso, Jerry Brown, Jr., Christine Kehoe, Holly Mitchell, Kamala Harris, Office of Public Defender, Office of District Attorney, A.C.L.U., N.A.A.C.P., C.A.C.J., P.L.O., Rosen, Bien, Flavin & Grunfeld, David Bernstein and C.D.C.R. |
| 2:2014cv01644 |
| July 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ORDER adopting 98 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/27/16: Defendant's summary judgment motion (ECF No. 80) is granted as to the merits of plaintiff's retaliation claim. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/7/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file his opposition (ECF No. 89 ) is GRANTED; and it is RECOMMENDED that defendant's summary judgment motion (ECF No. 80 ) be granted as to the merits of plaintiff's retaliation claim. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/25/2016 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 88 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Plaintiff's opposition to defendants' summary judgment motion is due within thirty days of the date of this order. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/23/2016 GRANTING plaintiff's 85 motion for an extension of time; DENYING plaintiff's 82 motion to compel; and plaintiff's opposition to defendant's summary judgment motion is due within 30 days, defendant may file a reply within 14 days thereafter. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/17/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file a motion to compel (ECF No. 78 ) is GRANTED; plaintiffs motion to compel (ECF No. 82 ) is deemed timely filed; def endant shall file a response to the motion to compel within 21 days of the date of this order; plaintiff may file a reply within seven days thereafter; plaintiff is not required to file an opposition to defendants summary judgment motion until resolution of his motion to compel; Plaintiffs motion for a settlement conference and to stay this action pending a settlement conference (ECF No. 79 ) is DENIED.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/4/16 DENYING 74 Motion to Amend the Complaint. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/18/2016 DENYING 64 Motion for Reconsideration. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/8/2015 ORDERING that the 46 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED in full. Defendants' 41 motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to defendants Barroga and Heilbrun, and DENIED as to defendant Martinez. Defendant Martinez shall file a response to the complaint within twenty days of the date of this order. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/1/2015 DENYING plaintiff's 48 motion to compel; and DENYING plaintiff's 53 motion for a settlement conference. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/13/15 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this action; and it is RECOMMENDED that defendants' motion to dismiss 41 be granted as to defendants Barroga and Heilbrun, and denied as to defendant Martinez. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/6/15 ORDERING that Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 38 ) is granted in part and denied in part; Plaintiffs request that the April 29, 2015 screening order be amended to find tha t plaintiff has stated potentially colorable claims for conspiracy to retaliate and defamation, slander and libel in violation of state law is granted; defendants are ordered to respond to these claims when they file pleadings addressing the merits of plaintiffs claims; plaintiffs motion for reconsideration is denied in all other respects.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/20/15 ORDERING that Plaintiffs motion to amend 22 is granted; Plaintiffs second amended complaint 21 is dismissed. Within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Amendment and submit to the court the completed Notice of Amendment; and an original and one copy of the Third Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs motion for injunctive relief 18 is DENIED.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER denying 16 Motion for Reconsideration signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/24/14. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order to pay the filing fee. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/15/14 ORDERING that Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis 5 is DENIED; plaintiff shall pay the filing fee within thirty days of the date of this order; failure to pay the filing fee will result in the dismissal of this action; Plaintiffs motions for substitution of parties (ECF Nos. 4 and 7 ) are DENIED without prejudice. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/29/2014 GRANTING plaintiff's 9 motion for an extension of time; and plaintiff has 30 days to file an amended complaint. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/23/14 ordering plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order to file a complaint. The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff the form for filing a civil rights action and application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. Plaintiff's pleading filed 07/11/14 1 is disregarded. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
