Ellis v. Qualls et al
| Robert Ellis |
| C. Hammond, Turner, Harper, Appeals Coordinator, Lee, L. Lopez, D. Qualls and J. A. Zamora |
| 2:2014cv01875 |
| August 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/8/2015 VACATING the court's prior order denying plaintiff's IFP application; and this action is SUMMARILY DISMISSED as duplicative of Ellis v. Foulk, 2:14-cv-0802 AC, and accordingly, no filing fee is assessed. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/23/14 denying 2 Motion to Proceed IFP as barred from proceeding in forma pauperis in this action pursuant to the 3 strikes provision of 28 USC 1915(g). Plaintiff is directed to pay the filing fee in full within 28 days of the date of this order. Absent timely payment of the filing fee, this case will be dismissed. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/4/14 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE within 30 days why this case should not be dismissed as duplicative of Case No. 2:14-cv-0802 AC; and plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis is HELD IN ABEYANCE, pending resolution of this Order To Show Cause.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
