Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Miller v. Lee et al
as 6:2026cv01715
Plaintiff:
Theodore Miller
Defendant:
Aaron M. Lee, Benjamin Wood and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
RODRIQUEZ v. BISIGNANO
as 2:2026cv05675
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE RODRIQUEZ
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Howlett v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
as 2:2026cv02429
Plaintiff:
Lee Howlett
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Lee v. Gothe et al
as 3:2026cv02044
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lavon Lee, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Ryan Gothe, Jim Cunningham, Marcus Holley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Middleton et al
as 6:2026cv02052
Plaintiff:
Lee Delva Nelson
Defendant:
Whitney Middleton, Rick Lubbin, Andrew C Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Haney v. Galvan et al
as 2:2026cv08696
Plaintiff:
Mark Lee Haney
Defendant:
Deputy Vanessa Galvan, Deputy Sienna Arbiso, Sgt. Mike Kennard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Ocie Lynch v. Warden, William E. Donaldson Correctional Facility, et al
as 26-12759
Petitioner:
OCIE LEE LYNCH
Respondent:
WARDEN, WILLIAM E. DONALDSON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
