Walker v. Whiting et al
| John Walker |
| Whiting, P. Massa, Lee, Blanco, Johns and Bilgera |
| 2:2014cv02064 |
| September 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 09/14/15 ORDERING that this action is dismissed against defendants Whiting, Blanco, Johns and Bilgera with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a). All parties are to b ear their own costs and attorney's fees. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice as to defendant Lee, and this case closed. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) Modified on 9/15/2015 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/20/15 ordering no later than 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall notify the court whether he also intends to dismiss this action with prejudice as to the unserved defendant. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER denying 44 Motion to modify scheduling order signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 06/01/15. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/12/2015 GRANTING in part plaintiff's 35 motion for an extension of time. Plaintiff has until 7/10/2015 to complete discovery. The 24 Discovery and Scheduling Order is further modified as to motions to compel discovery due 7/24/2015; all other pretrial motions shall be filed on or before 10/16/2015. Defendant's 34 motion to compel is DENIED without prejudice to renewal. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/24/2015 ADOPTING IN FULL 30 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 23 Motion to Dismiss; DISMISSING Defendant P. Massa from this action with prejudice. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/13/2015 ORDERING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this action; AND RECOMMENDING that defendant Massa's 23 motion to dismiss be granted and that Massa be dismissed from this action with prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER FOR PAYMENT ON INMATE FILING FEE signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/15/14. The Director of the Nevada Department of Corrections or a designee shall collect from Plaintiffs prison trust account an initial partial filing fee and shall forward the amount to the Clerk of the Court. Thereafter, shall collect monthly payments and forward them to the Clerk of the Court, until the $350.00 filing fee for this action has been paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of Plaintiff's signed IFP affidavit on the Director of the Nevada Department of Corrections (NDOC), 5500 Snyder Ave., P.O. Box 7011, Carson City, Nevada, 89701. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the court. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/10/2014 ORDERING plaintiff to submit, within 30 days, a certified copy of his trust account statement.(Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
