Barrera v. Muniz
Petitioner: Enrique Barrera
Respondent: W. L. Muniz
Case Number: 2:2014cv02260
Filed: September 29, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER adopting 57 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/25/18. Petitioner's 53 motion for a certificate of appealability is construed as a Rule 59(e) motion and is DENIED. The court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability. (Kastilahn, A)
January 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/30/2018 GRANTING 60 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner shall file his objections to the findings and recommendations within 30 days from the date of this order. No further extensions of time will be granted. (Fabillaran, J)
December 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 57 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 12/03/17 RECOMMENDING that petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability 53 be construed as a Rule 59(e) motion and be denied. Motion 53 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
July 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/11/2017 GRANTING 46 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner to file and serve his objections to 45 Findings and Recommendations within 30 days from the filed date of this order. (Henshaw, R)
June 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 45 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/26/2017 RECOMMENDING the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
January 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/26/17 ordering petitioner's 8/30/16 motion 41 is denied as unnecessary. Petitioner's traverse is acceptable in its current format. (Plummer, M)
August 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/26/16 DENYING as moot 39 Motion for Extension of time. (Dillon, M)
February 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/19/16 ORDERING that Petitioners motion for a stay and abeyance (Doc. No. 22 ) is DENIED as having been rendered moot; Respondent is directed to file a response to petitioners second amended habeas petition within 60 days from the date of this order. (Dillon, M)
January 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/06/16 ordering within 30 days of the date of service of this order, petitioner shall either: a) file a second amended petition containing all of his exhausted claims; or b) file a declaration explaining the status of any pending habeas corpus proceedings in state court. The clerk of the court is directed to send petitioner the court's form for filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Plummer, M)
November 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/3/2015 ADOPTING 19 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 11 Motion to Dismiss; DENYING 18 Motion for Stay and Abeyance; DIRECTING the petitioner to file within thirty days, an amended petition proceeding fully on his exhausted Claims (1) and (2) or an amended petition accompanied by a motion for a stay pursuant to the Kelly procedure. (Michel, G.)
July 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 19 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/22/15 Respondents motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 11 ) be granted; Petitioners renewed motion for a stay and abeyance under the procedure outlined in the Supreme Courts decision in Rhines (Doc. No. 18 ) be denied; and Within thirty days of any order adopting these findings and recommendations, petitioner be directed to file an amended petition containing only his exhausted Claims (1) and (2). Petitioner may elect to proceed on his fully exhausted Claims (1) and (2) or he may file with his amended petition a motion for a stay pursuant to the Kelly procedure. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
May 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/30/15 ORDERING that Petitioner's motion for a stay and abeyance (Doc. No. 14 ) is denied without prejudice; and within 30 days from the date of service of this order, petitioner shall eithe r: (a) file a renewed motion for a stay and abeyance indicating he wishes to proceed under the Kelly procedure, together with an amended habeas petition containing only his exhausted claims (1) and (2), or (b) file a renewed motion for a stay and abeyance indicating he wishes to proceed under the Rhines procedure; any renewed motion must make a showing of good cause and satisfy the remaining requirements under Rhines.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barrera v. Muniz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Enrique Barrera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: W. L. Muniz
Represented By: Jill M. Thayer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?